期刊文献+

腹部CT与核磁胰胆管成像在肝外胆结石诊断中的对比评价 预览

Comparative Evaluation of Abdominal CT and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosis of Extrahepatic Gall Stones
在线阅读 下载PDF
分享 导出
摘要 目的对腹部CT与核磁胆管成像在肝外胆结石诊断中的临床效果进行研究比较。方法方便选取2015年1月—2017年1月期间在该院进行治疗的52例肝外胆结石患者,作为该次的研究对象。按照随机分组法,将所有的患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组26例患者,采用核磁胰胆管成像法进行治疗;对照组26例患者,采用腹部CT进行治疗,将两组患者的诊断结果与临床结果进行比较后,横向比较两组患者的诊断准确率。结果腹部CT共检查出10例被检出肝外胆结石患者,2例误诊,16例漏诊,检出率为38.46%,诊断准确率为30.78%;核磁胰胆管成像共检查出23例被检出肝外胆结石,3例误诊,5例漏诊,检出率为88.46%,诊断准确率为80.76%。结论在肝外胆结石的诊断中,与腹部CT相比,核磁胰胆管成像的检出率明显更高,且诊断准确率也明显高于腹部CT,值得今后的临床工作广泛运用。 Objective To research and compare the clinical effect of abdominal CT and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of extrahepatic gall stones.Methods 52 cases of patients with extrahepatic gall stones treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were convenient selected as the research objects and randomly divided into two groups with 26 cases in each,the experimental group and the control group were respectively treated with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and abdominal CT,and the diagnosis accurate rate of the two groups was compared.Results 10 cases were diagnosed with extrahepatic gall stones by the abdominal CT,including 2 cases misdiagnosed and 16 cases in missed diagnosis,and the test rate was 38.46%,and the diagnosis accurate rate was 30.78%,and 23 cases were diagnosed with extrahepatic gall stones by the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,including 3 cases misdiagnosed and 5 cases in missed diagnosis,and the test rate was 88.46%and the diagnosis accurate rate was 80.76%.Conclusion The test rate of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of extrahepatic gall stones is higher than that of abdominal CT,and the diagnosis accurate rate is obviously higher than that of abdominal CT,which is worth wide application in clinic.
作者 张鹤
出处 《中外医疗》 2017年第34期188-189,195共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 腹部CT 核磁胰胆管成像 肝外胆结石 Abdominal CT Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography Extrahepatic gall stones
作者简介 张鹤(1982-),男,山东蓬莱人,本科,主治医师,研究方向:医学影像,影像科。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

  • 1曾云桂,刘顺仪.超声对肝外胆管结石的诊断价值[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(3):31-31. 被引量:1
  • 2张雷达,王曙光,别平,陈平,董家鸿.不同方式的腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆总管结石的临床前瞻性研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(5):474-477. 被引量:51
  • 3Lyass S, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration[J]. Surg Endosc,2006,20:441 445. 被引量:1
  • 4于聪慧,梅建民,余昌中,等.胆总管继发结石患者胆囊管形态的变化[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,20lO,16:823-824. 被引量:1
  • 5Leida Z, Ping B,Shuguang W,et al. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after [aparoscopic choledochotomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22 : 1595-1599. 被引量:1
  • 6Zi Yin, Kang Xu, Jian Sun, et al. Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? [J]. Ann Surg, 2013,257:54-66. 被引量:1
  • 7E1-Geidie AA. Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic eholedo-chotomy? [J]. Gastrointest Surg, 2010,14 844-848. 被引量:1
  • 8Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+ LCBDE vs ERCP/S+ LC for common bile duct stone disease[J]. Arch Surg, 2010,145 28-33. 被引量:1
  • 9罗光慧,张建平.腹部CT与核磁胰胆管成像在肝外胆结石诊断中的对比分析[J].中国中医药科技,2014,18(5):120-121. 被引量:2
  • 10唐建新.腹部CT与核磁胰胆管成像在肝外胆结石诊断中的对比分析[J].医药前沿,2014,4(29):86-87. 被引量:1

共引文献110

投稿分析

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈