期刊文献+

民事证据调查令制度实证研究——以莆田市的49份判决为样本 预览

Empirical Study on the System of Civil Evidence Investigation Order--Taking 49 Judgments in Putian as a sample
在线阅读 下载PDF
收藏 分享 导出
摘要 民事证据调查令对当事人诉讼权利的保障、法院审判中立地位的保障、第三人权利的保护具有重要的现实意义。根据民事证据调查令在判决书中的情况来看,现行法律规定对民事证据调查令的申请主体、适用程序、是否需要质证、可调取的证据范围等均不明确。建议将民事证据调查令进行相关的立法规定,将申请主体明确为当事人和经授权的代理人,视情况决定是否适用于上诉审程序,调取的证据需要经过质证,明确民事证据调查令的证据种类。 The civil evidence investigation order has important practical significance for the protection of the litigant rights of the parties,the guarantee of the neutrality of the courts,and the protection of the rights of third parties.The current law stipulates that the applicant body of the civil evidence investigation order,the applicable procedures,whether it is required to be cross-examined,and the scope of evidence that can be obtained are not clear.It is recommended that the civil evidence investigation order be related to the relevant legislative provisions,the applicant subject should be clearly identified as the party and the authorized agent,and whether the evidence is applicable to the appeal review procedure,and the evidence obtained needs to be cross-examined,defining the type of evidence for a civil evidence investigation order.
作者 梁琴 Liang Qin(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411100)
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《牡丹江大学学报》 2019年第3期89-94,共6页 Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词 民事证据调查令 申请人 被申请人 实施规则 civil evidence investigation order applicant respondent implementation rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献42

共引文献45

投稿分析
职称考试

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈