期刊文献+

综合分期治疗小儿面瘫的临床观察 预览

Clinical Observation of Peripheral Facial Paralysis with Integrated ChineseWestern Therapy Methods at Different Stages
在线阅读 下载PDF
收藏 分享 导出
摘要 目的:观察综合分期治疗小儿周围性面瘫的临床疗效。方法对治疗组50例患者按急性期、恢复期、后遗症期采用西医结合针灸、低频脉冲电针仪、TDP微波照射(特定电磁波治疗器)等不同方法分期治疗。并与50例常规针灸治疗患儿进行对照研究。采用House—Brackmann分级量表(FDIs)、面部残疾指数(FDI)量表评价疗效。结果治疗后治疗组和对照组FDIp和FDIs均优于治疗前(P<0.05);且治疗后FDIs治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05),但FDIp两组的差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后FDIp和FDIs均优于治疗前,提示两种疗法均可改善面瘫患者的预后。结论两种疗法均可改善面瘫患者的预后,但采用不同方法分期治疗周围性面瘫效果优于常规针刺方法。 Objective This study is to observe the clinical effect of different methods on peripheral facial paralysis at different stages. Methods 100 patients were randomly divided into a treatment group (n=50) and a control group (n=50).In the treatment group ,take Integrated ChineseWestern Therapy Methods to treat according to its different stages,while those in the control group were treated with nomal acupuncture. House-Brackmann scale, Facial Disability Index scale were applied to evaluate the facial function. Result FDIp and FDIs of the treatment group and control group after curation were better than them before treatment. There were significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). FDIp of the treatment group after curation was better than the control group(P<0.05).But There were no significant difference between the two groups in FDIs(P>0.05). Conclusion Both the effectiveness of acupuncture according to different path-stages and acupuncture irrespectivess of path-stages are good,but the former is better than the latter.
作者 唐艳 勾志静 Tang Yan[1];Gou Zhijing[2]
出处 《临床研究》 2016年第5期3-4,共2页
关键词 分期针刺 House-Brackmann分级量表 面部残疾指数(FDI)量表 儿童 Staging acupuncture House-Brackmann scale Facial Disability Index scale Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

共引文献258

投稿分析
职称考试

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈